>gabes/the letter
absurdwednesday2026-08-19

there is now a ranked list of the 34 best courses for starting an ai agency. the reliable revenue in that economy is the course fee.

if the model worked as advertised, they would be running the agency instead of filming the masterclass.

somebody has published a ranked comparison of 34 courses on how to start an ai agency in 2026, which means that market has enough supply to warrant comparison shopping. the condition it creates lands on your desk rather than theirs: the person pitching you an ai build may be six weeks out of a course that taught them to white-label someone else's tool and put a retainer on it, and the pitch sounds good because the pitch is what the course actually sold. the cost is a build that works in the demo, breaks on your real data, and cannot be repaired by the person who sold it, because they never wrote it.

the fake protection is asking whether they have done this before, which was module three. do the version that holds: ask what the system does when the data is messy, ask them to name the underlying tool and what happens to you if that tool changes its pricing or its api, then ask for the last client still running it and call that client yourself. someone who built it answers in a sentence. someone who bought the answer sends a case study.